As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that car users should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Given the context of the proliferation of cars in today’s world, it raises a question of whose responsibility it is to pay for upgrading

road

Use synonyms

systems. Some argue that

car

Use synonyms

owners are responsible for the cost;

however

Linking Words

, I believe that it is the

government

Use synonyms

who is financially and politically powerful enough to make significant changes. It is understandable why some think that private

car

Use synonyms

owners should cover the cost of maintaining and repairing the traffic infrastructure. The rise in

car

Use synonyms

ownership has gone in tandem with major roads being subject to degradation due to prolonged physical pressure from overload vehicles , which may

in turn

Add the comma(s)

, in turn,

show examples

lead to the emergence of potholes as a safety hazard to

road

Use synonyms

users.

However

Linking Words

, if we stand the views of

car

Use synonyms

drivers,

this

Linking Words

imposement

Correct your spelling

improvement

would seem too unfair for them. Since there is no scientific paper or official reports of how damaging their vehicles are to the roads as public assets, it would be a great challenge for anyone who makes an attempt to hold

this

Linking Words

group of people accountable.

Therefore

Linking Words

, the idea of forcing them to cover the cost of

road

Use synonyms

maintenance seems fairly unrealistic.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, if the

government

Use synonyms

is under

this

Linking Words

financial obligation , the case is much less of a gridlock.

First

Linking Words

, since the

government

Use synonyms

has already introduced tax schemes running the country, their national citizens are inarguably the beneficiaries from

road

Use synonyms

infrastructure subsidized by their tax payments. It seems of

a

Change the article

apply

show examples

common sense that maintaining safe traffic by upgrading roads is one of the

government

Use synonyms

’s obligations. If the public, including

car

Use synonyms

owners

Add the comma(s)

,

show examples

are asked to cover

such

Linking Words

costs,

this

Linking Words

would not only sound absurd to some extent

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

Linking Words

trigger social unrest.

Second

Linking Words

, only the

government

Use synonyms

possesses manpower and financial resources necessary for actually making a difference on a massive scale. If individuals have to pay extra for keeping the roads in a good condition,

this

Linking Words

would give rise to more managing tasks for leaders since they have to compose and pass a new bill, employ staff to administer

such

Linking Words

extra tax money, let alone

this

Linking Words

process may take ages to enforce due to people being reluctant to observe the new law.

Therefore

Linking Words

, a top-down approach to tackle the decline of roads’ quality should sound more feasible. In conclusion, there are still some justifications for making

car

Use synonyms

owners the payers for roads improvement;

however

Linking Words

, I believe that only the authorities can make

this

Linking Words

process possible and meaningful since they have the resource and power necessary for it.