Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free. Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

These days, online classes and work-from-home conditions are rampant because of the recent pandemic. Those have been the most in-demand methods,

instead

of the typical face-to-face interaction. Having said that, a drastic increase in the demands for Internet

access

 has been evident. 

However

, some providers may take advantage of the situation. 

Consequently

, they might require the consumers to produce for a price out of the market. For that reason, some people argue that Internet

access

should be free for all users.

To begin

with, the Internet has been a knowledge pool particularly for those aiming to stay informed and updated with the most recent news and trends. 

Moreover

, students and researchers can be snowed over with information, without being restricted to books and libraries. Another positive for

this

 matter represents the users' ability to be engaged in exhilarating communities online, aside from connecting and communicating with other individuals regardless of the distance. On the contrary, in spite of the advancements offered by free accessibility to

I

Add an article

the

show examples

nternet, financial constraints might occur in the side of the providers and the 

government

. 

This

may not happen if the consumers are expected to pay for the provided services. 

This

is in view of the fact that a large amount of capital is utilized to perform installation and continuous Internet service possible. 

Additionally

, the 

government

's finances should be aimed 

in

Verify preposition usage

at

show examples

 providing for the more in-need sectors of the society. 

Instead

of granting free

access

to Internet users; its budget should,

therefore

, be focused on poverty-related issues. 

Consequently

, if internet

access

will be priceless, a considerable portion of the 

government

's budget will be diminished to subsidize for the former's service. 

However

, with

this

 situation, a significant economic impact may occur affectingly to the rest of

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

 society. In conclusion, Internet

access

 can be of

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

 vital aid in

this

growing modern community. 

However

, its financial effect can be marked in a long-term period. 

This

 is because it can deplete the 

government

's financial capability in sustaining free-of-charge Internet usage since monetary gain may not be possible with

such

 scenarios.