Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It seems that people are disabled to enhance the environment wellbeing,
furthermore
, only governments and significant companies can bring changes. I disagree that individuals not contributing to nature developing because overall success depends on each person,
although
governments and companies
also
have their contribution.
To begin
, the global improvement relies on each individual rather a
government
. Everybody is a part of a great mechanism that calls society. If
m
Add an article
a
show examples
an wants to eliminate the quality of the environment, only working together will bring positive results despite all odds.
For example
, in Australia, when it comes to typhoon time a lot of litter
such
as plastic bags, glass bottles, and paper were stacked on the seashore,
however
, the
government
did anything to get rid of contamination.
Besides
, one warmhearted individual decided to do rather wait for the parliament's actions, and he assembled local people together in volunteer groups which during one week cleaned from the garbage whole area.
However
, a
government
and many big companies are able to contribute to nature improvement too. The state has the power to ask and, if needed, force people to do anything,
therefore
, it seems easier to engage more people with help of the
government
.
In addition
, big companies, due to their wealth of resources and money, may lessen many environmental problems,
however
, need to notice that in both cases the individual's desire is the key point. If there no willingness from a person, neither ministry nor authoritative companies can do anything. In conclusion, it appears that only governments and big companies have the power to deal with environmental problems, whereas individuals can do nothing to develop the greenhouse. I disagree with
this
statement because without people's desire cannot be done anything.
Submitted by zere.lepessova on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainable practices
  • renewable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • waste reduction
  • conservation
  • ecosystem
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • responsibility
  • leadership
  • legislation
  • investment
  • collaboration
  • systemic change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: