Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. Which solution is better?

It is true that housing is one of the main modern issues. While some cities solve

this

problem by constructing taller buildings, others build houses using more areas of land available.

This

essay will discuss both sides and present arguments to explain why I support the former solution. When it comes to housing, some cities tend to build houses rather than buildings. According to their governors,

although

building houses requires a wider area of land, it provides more privacy to inhabitants. To illustrate, if someone would like to invite friends to a party, definitely, living in a house would be more comfortable.

Furthermore

, some researchers have pointed out that families prefer to live in houses rather than apartments and governments want to respect their desires. Alternatively, other cities choose to construct taller buildings.

This

is because taller buildings require fewer areas of land and,

therefore

, it is less expensive. In my opinion,

this

solution is better than the aforementioned one. Not only buildings are constructed using less money, but

also

less time. Modern engineering has almost everything ready and those buildings are constructed by blocks in a couple of months.

In addition

, constructing buildings allows governments to

also

provide some common use structures,

such

as pools or gyms, which will increase the quality of life for those inhabitants. To sum up,

although

some cities believe building house is better because it provides more privacy, I think the best solution is to build taller buildings because it requires less money and time.