Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities.   To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While many people hold the belief that professional careers

such

as nurses should be paid more than celebrities, others have a contradicting idea and suggest that sportspersons and entertainers deserve more

income

than professional workers. I hold the view that the

income

of each career should be based on the service that they provide, rather than the name of their

job

. On the one hand, many people affirm that essential jobs should be paid a high salary. Since these professions are dealing with public health or the future of society, professionals deserve the highest possible payment. While it is unanimously agreed that they should be quite well off, comparing their

income

with celebrities does not seem appropriate.

For example

,

although

the

job

of a teacher is vital for training our children, their

income

is much less than a successful professional

soccer

player,

however

, the number of teachers in society is much more than a professional

soccer

player, which is caused the difference in

income

. The total

income

of all teachers is many times more than all of the

soccer

players.

On the other hand

, face values,

such

as sportspersons and entertainment personalities are distinguished and unique in what they do. The payment for every career is determined by the uniqueness of a

job

; were more people able to do a

job

, their salary would be lower.

For instance

, many people after proper training can be a nurse, whereas million youngster start playing

soccer

every year; a few have the chance to play in the

first

league team, and only one will become Messi.

This

reason justifies the very high incomes of face values. It is logical to conclude that it would not be appropriate to judge the

income

of a worker by the area he or she is giving the service, rather than their salary should be based on the peculiarity of their work. I personally strongly disagree with the generalization of a higher

income

of professional workers compared with entertainers. that the person who is talented enough to be unique deserves a high

income

, yet he or she may be a surgeon who performs a unique surgery or an entertainer who enchants millions of people. I

also

suggest that

instead

of counting on the

income

of each profession, stress should be on the outcome;

in other words

, to the services that they provide rather than the name of the profession.