Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is established in British and Australian laws that a

jury

Use synonyms

is not allowed to know information about criminal past of an offender because

this

Linking Words

can protect that person,

however

Linking Words

, there are solicitors who advise providing a

jury

Use synonyms

trial with all criminal records of the

violator

Use synonyms

before they have made their verdict. In my opinion, the

jury

Use synonyms

should not be given

this

Linking Words

knowledge due to the saving of unbiased perception of the person they judge and possible danger for the

jury

Use synonyms

's members.

To begin

Linking Words

, if a

jury

Use synonyms

is given information about past crimes of a

violator

Use synonyms

, it will interfere to look on a committed crime. It is common knowledge that people often make conclusions about another individual with the information they heard or saw about him,

however

Linking Words

, when it comes to a criminal case, a history of previous offender's crimes should not be involved in the investigation but only facts and evidence because each violence is independent on person's criminal past but on circumstances.

For example

Linking Words

, in my city, the

jury

Use synonyms

was given the all past facts about the criminal,

therefore

Linking Words

, they decided that in

this

Linking Words

time he is

also

Linking Words

committed a crime;

however

Linking Words

, after two years, the police found evidence that he is not guilty. There is another fact that material given about previous crimes may damage

jury

Use synonyms

trial lives. Usually,people have chosen to be

jury

Use synonyms

just random people with their routine lives that could be injured by suspect's companions who want nobody knows facts about crimes their prisoned companion committed. To illustrate, in Spain, before one court case started, the

jury

Use synonyms

was given data about what an offender had done and with who; after the process finished there were recorded attempts to kill some of the

jury

Use synonyms

members. In conclusion, despite suggestions of some lawyers to provide the

jury

Use synonyms

with records about past of a

violator

Use synonyms

I disagree with

this

Linking Words

consideration due to potential danger for the

jury

Use synonyms

members,

moreover

Linking Words

, they ought to be unbiased about

violator

Use synonyms

's personality in the sake of focusing on a crime.