Many countries want to host international sports event, while other countries think that hosting sports events has more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A highly controversial issue relates to whether nations should

host

global sports events or if it just brings about problems to the countries. In

this

essay, I will examine both points of view and give reasons why I believe that the arguments against hosting these massive events are stronger. It is commonly believed that sporting events in the globe considerable outweigh any disadvantages. The main reason for

that is

because

this

type of venture raises a country's economy, which is caused by subsidies brought from great corporations around the globe that fund the event. It is

also

possible to say that it increases the rate of tourism interested in the

host

country, that can pave the way for their economic development. A good illustration here could be Brazil, where the world cup hosted in 2014 helped the country's economy and has opened its doors for new enterprises.

On the other hand

, people believe that these sort of events only trigger to drawbacks. It is often argued that too much money is spent on it, which is mentioned by either developing or developed countries,

instead

of using

this

amount to solve community's problems

such

as health, education and safety. A

second

point is that all the infrastructure used to

host

these events, like stadiums, will not be used in the future, which shows that it was not worth it to

host

the event. A particularly example here is the 2018 world cup held in Africa, where almost all the stations are rundown nowadays. In conclusion, both arguments have their merits. On balance,

however

, I believe that only developed countries should

host

this

sort of event since the developing ones have more important issues to deal as aforementioned.