Education these days is considered vital for success.
In particular
, many people aspire to get a university degree. Linking Words
However
, higher education is often not an option for young people from poor rural families. Some, Linking Words
therefore
, argue that the entry requirements should be lower for Linking Words
such
applicants to achieve a level of fairness in society. I partly agree with Linking Words
this
view.
On the one hand, there are some justifications for setting easier entrance requirements for applicants from disadvantaged non-urban backgrounds. Linking Words
First
, students in Linking Words
such
areas don’t have chances to access high-quality education like their counterparts in the cities; Linking Words
therefore
, lowering entrance standards is believed to bring equality between learners in different economic-level regions. Linking Words
For example
, when taking an entrance exam, Vietnamese students would have plus points if they are in “special conditions” Linking Words
such
as minority ethnic or living in mountainous areas.
Linking Words
Nevertheless
, it is Linking Words
also
important not to set the bar too low for entry to universities. For a start, the main purpose of the university is to provide high-quality human resources. For Linking Words
this
reason, if applicants are accepted because of their backgrounds while the academic level is not up to eligible standards required, they would find it hard to keep up with their friends. Linking Words
Instead
, the government should make policies to promote the local educational system, Linking Words
such
as constructing more schools or recruiting more teachers. These measures not only enhance the educational quality in underprivileged areas but Linking Words
also
create a competitive workforce for the countries.
In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that investing in educational facilities or requiring more high-qualified teachers rather than setting a lower entry bar for rural students would create better results.Linking Words
dinhvyhanh