Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.

Numerous characters deem the government need to legislate a law against dim a man makes to reduce the stress of

people

nearby;

in contrast

, certain groups of

people

oppose and affirm prohibiting

this

right of a human is discourteous and unacceptable. In

this

essay, I will examine,

firstly

, the merit of forbidding uproar of an individual, and

secondly

, the negative aspect of

this

phenomenon, followed by a reasoned conclusion. On the one hand, many inhabitants, especially youngsters, intended to listen to pieces of music with a high volume that annoys other

people

, and sing with a microphone in a home.

This

incidence irritates neighbours, and sometimes they call the police.

For instance

, many college's students were having a party in a house at night, making neighbours to not sleep and get furious.

Hence

, a rule settling

this

type of issues is essential to form a happy society.

On the other hand

,

this

legislation gets followed by some drawbacks; one of these is

people

protesting that the administration should not violate civil-liberties like restricting to make noise. If we advocate the law, human-beings will deteriorate, and back to savage age,

people

can murder and rob without penalty.

For example

, the United Nations condemn actions like prohibiting civil right, as it knows repercussions behind

this

occasion.

Thus

, some individuals assume we can not break what our ancestors tried to declare for thousands of years. In conclusion, from the arguments and examples given, I firmly believe

although

there is a huge shortcoming, the virtue of laws is immeasurable, as without orders and legislations the society will not exist.