some people think that the government i s wasting money on arts and that this money could better be spent elsewhere. To what extents do you agree with this view?

Arts define the richness of a nation and aid them in their economic development. Others,

however

, argued by a section of society that authorities should not spend money on crafts,

instead

devote it to infrastructure & medical benefits.

To begin

with, fine-arts plays a prominent role in enhancing countries wealth. In fact, it acts as one of the major factors in the development of indigenous society .To exemplify, Thailand is one of the best examples, why the executives should look after their valuable crafts. For Thailand, 90% of their economy gets generate from tourism only,

r

Add an article

the

show examples

eason being their judicial give 50% of their income in order to preserve their heritage items.

On the other hand

, the direct investment in roads and infrastructure in the state gives the immediate impact on local well being.

Additionally

,the medical benefits are

also

considered to be one of the imperative particulars for people of the nation.To illustrate, in the pandemic situation in 2019, the government had to expend millions from their budget, which require well financial preparation in advance. In conclusion, I firmly believe that the council should know to balance art and the development of

c

Add an article

the

a

show examples

ountry and should never overlook their heritage work.