Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There is a question about which organizations should expense money on supporting talented

artists

. While some argue that it should be the responsibility of the

government

, I believe that these creators could find other financial sources. On the one hand, I consider that some

art

projects undoubtedly require financial assistance from the authority. In fact, some public artworks not only help create distinctive characteristics but

also

represent the identity, culture, and history of the nation. They serve to educate people about the city and act as landmarks that can attract millions of tourists annually.

Therefore

, with the enormous funding from the

government

,

artists

could unleash their creativity without worrying about financial issues and create mind-blowing designs.

On the other hand

, I concur with some advocates that creative

artists

should find other assistance for funding

art

.

First

, the spending priorities in the

government

’s budget should be public infrastructures and human capital development. According to recent reports, higher investments in these sectors could support economic growth as well as prepare a competent workforce in the future.

Moreover

,

artists

can find other sources of funding

instead

of relying on

government

support.

For example

, they can sell their artworks or get donations from

art

lovers to pay for living expenses or invest in the following

art

projects.

Last

but not least, the community

also

should be responsible for advertising these domestic products.

As a result

, they support the creators, both mentally and physically. In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that not only the

government

but

also

other organizations or even the community could give funding to talented

artists

.