Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, it is true that some celebrities are known for their glamorous lifestyles rather than for their contribution to society. Some argue that

this

phenomenon has an adverse effect on the youth. I partly agree with that view. On the one hand, famous people somehow have influences on the community, especially their followers. At puberty age, the personality and behaviour of teenagers could be affected by many factors, including their idols whom they consider as role models. Take obsessive fans as an example. When they looking at the exotic and lavish lifestyle of their idols, they try to imitate and possess similar objects, despite the financial issues.

This

exerts materialistic lifestyles, which has potential negative impacts on impressionable adolescents, both mentally and physically.

However

, the root cause of

this

problem is not the flashy lifestyle of celebrities. Evidently, the family and nurture environment rather than celebrities’ glamorous lifestyle, have more impact on shaping the behaviour of young people. It is important for everyone to learn to live within their means and to have a moral code of conduct.

Furthermore

, there are at least as many celebrities whose accomplishments make them excellent role models for young people. They demonstrate great effort, determination, and ambition, which is required for someone who wants to be truly successful in their chosen field. In conclusion, while superstars have impacts on the community, it is wrong to blame them for the wrongdoings of their young followers. Each individual should have their own moral principles to guide them through life and nobody is supposed to blindly imitate others.