Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.

For some time now, it has become a topic of debate as a section of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society believes that paying excessively to the senior-most staff of an organization is completely acceptable,

whereas

others hold a view that

this

is not fair to the junior workers. In my opinion, I completely agree that a huge compensation to executives should be regarded positively. On the one hand, many have valid arguments against higher

salaries

to

Change preposition

for

show examples

executive-level

employees

. First and foremost, everyone in a firm works around 9 hours a day,

that is

the reason everyone should be paid

accordingly

.

This

is because as per the IT markets' standard,

employees

on each level have to clock at least 45 hours per week regardless of their positions and Infosys is the prime example of

this

.

Besides

this

, without any effort

of

Change preposition

from

show examples

the workforce

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

lower positions, seniors can not drive a company because most of the technical work is done by the juniors and higher-level

employees

just deliver that to clients.

Furthermore

,

employees

with less

experience

have

also

invested a prodigious amount of money and time to acquire the required

experience

and educational degree;

thus

, attractive

salaries

to seniors is not a fair process followed by companies.

On the other hand

, people who advocate the view that higher

salaries

to

Change preposition

for

show examples

directors and VPs have certain reasons behind their thinking.

Firstly

, running a firm smoothly requires a team of workers with extensive

experience

and knowledge about different industries to deal with numerous international clients and to crack any deal in no time. These senior-most people have been working in different sectors for ages so their

experience

and work commitments should be compensated with handsome

salaries

.

Besides

this

, if a director fails at any point means an entire organization would suffer. Mahindra Satyam,

for example

, has a similar story where

CFO

Correct article usage

the CFO

show examples

failed to run the company

as a result

, lower staff had to suffer as they were terminated.

Therefore

, I wholeheartedly agree that attractive remuneration to directors is completely fair and the right approach.

To conclude

,

although

many still argue that paying excessive

salaries

to the topmost worker is unfair to juniors, I am completely convinced that

this

is definitely a fair option as these people are behind running the business properly and

due to

this

the workers in lower positions are earning.