Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In modern society, there is a heated debate about whether governments should subsidize artistic and cultural activities. While the notion of public funding for the arts and
culture
is opposed by a few, I am firmly convinced that government expenditure should be spent on these sectors for some reasons. On the one hand, admittedly, those opposing financially supporting arts and
culture
could provide certain justifications.
To begin
with, critical issues
such
as poverty, social unrest or environmental problems remain major concern reducing the citizens quality of life in some countries,
hence
, priority should be identified properly.
Besides
, torn by
such
pressing issues, residents whose welfare is not fully guaranteed by the state would by no means show a keen interest in art and
culture
.
Therefore
, the allocation of resources to
this
sector has generally deemed a waste of public funding.
On the other hand
, I strongly believe that the role of developing art and
culture
activities is of greater significance for the community and should be publicly financed.
Firstly
, via artworks, unique cultural characteristics are preserved and bequeathed.
For example
, Dong Ho Painting Village, an aesthetic symbol in Vietnam
culture
, has succeeded in passing cultural traits and traditions from generations to generations by highlighting every aspect of daily rural life in their paintings.
Secondly
, performing arts companies can make a significant contribution to the local economy by generating more employment for artists and designers, and the state will
thus
benefit from a rise in tax revenue. All in all,
although
some people are opposed to the idea of providing financial assistance for art and
culture
, I believe that
this
practice proves to bring unquestionable benefits.
Submitted by vttha22 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: