There has been rising concern on a range of global health issues in the
last
few decades. Under
such
worries, a considerable number of people have started to ask for assistance from governments and regard solving these health threats as the responsibility of the state. From my perspective, the benefit of implementing government intervention outweighs its drawbacks.
Dealing with health issues, despite being closely related to the life quality of the population, is commonly believed as citizens’ own troubles,
instead
of the state’s duty. One crucial reason for
this
opinion is that intervention from governments is prone to deteriorate the domestic economy as a whole. Specifically, industries that are considered to be harmful to citizens’ physical conditions are likely to suffer. Take the fast-food industry as an example, the local government may choose to impose a consumption tax on fast foods to reduce people’s incentive to purchase these products.
Although
the possibility for residents to follow an unhealthy diet decreases, the number of fast-food restaurants tends to shrink, where thousands of labour forces are employed. As a consequence, massive unemployment from closing these shops could become a more severe problem.
Nevertheless
, the advantages of applying governments’ assistance are twofold. Not only is it beneficial to the physical and mental well-being of individuals, but
also
it is advantageous for accomplishing several macroeconomic objectives for the country. Generally, individuals tend to be reluctant to follow a healthy living style.
Therefore
, assistance from outsiders,
such
as sports coaches and private doctors, becomes indispensable.
However
, recruiting these professionals is unaffordable for the majority of residents, which enlarges the need to find
complementaryCorrect your spelling
show examples
services from the authorities. On top of
this
, guaranteeing the fitness status of citizens could release the pressure on the medical system.
This
is because individuals’ immune systems are strengthened when they lead healthy lifestyles, for which they are less likely to be attacked by virus and bacterium and could
thus
reduce their need for medical treatment.
Consequently
, the state is able to reduce its investment in hospitals and utilize its limited budgets in other fields,
such
as infrastructure.
To put everything into consideration, despite the suffering of related industries, the involvement of government benefits both the physical well-being of residents and could release the strain on the medical system, for which I believe applying interventions is more advantageous on balance.