The question of whether
are judged by their characteristics or according to their social prestige is a quite debatable topic today. It is considered by some that
are mostly judged by their wealth and social position, not by their core
. Both sides will be examined and I will discuss why I disagree with the given statement.
, ethics and
hold great importance in life, both personally and professionally. Nowadays,
are being judged by their social status,
of life.To illustrate, take the Indians
, they are very religious by nature,
Add a comma
It appears that you are missing a comma after the introductory phrase however. Consider adding a comma.
they forget their
for little gains.
are those acts we learn in our childhood from our parents and relatives.
,it is understandable for other
's emotions and respecting their culture and lives.
, no business and profession can progress without trust,
and ethics. Without these factors,all your degrees and certificates make no sense, if you do not know how to respect other
, good ethics and
depict your country, culture and heritage.
,it builds up a higher reputation for a country.
On the other hand
, there are celebrities that are judged by their material belongings and their social dignity.
happens as some want to take advantage of their well-off acquaintance.
, Paris Hilton, who is a well-known person, is seen with a lot of
, that does not mean that they know her personally.
, I think that there are situations where a person's position on the social ladder is more crucial than their inner traits.
In conclusion, many think that someone's worth can be determined by their assets and their status, not by their personality.
essay discussed both views and drew conclusions that
are ought not to be judged by the previously mentioned criteria.