We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Several

people

are in distress including those who are living beyond the boundaries. It is argued that not all of them can be helped and taking care of our own nation and surrounding

people

should be the only concern. I somewhat disagree with

this

statement due to many reasons which we will discuss

further

.

To begin

with, a country developing an item of utmost need worldwide should be distributed beyond boundaries.

This

will improve international relations among nations.

For instance

, during covid, India exported vaccines across the border including countries like Brazil, U.S and France due to its efficiency in treating patients.

Such

acts have tied a strong bond with many countries.

Additionally

, goods produced extensively in one country can be transported to other nations which have high demands worldwide. Perhaps, an exchange of commodities can

also

be considered a good option to fulfil each other's demand.

For example

, India imports Kiwi from New Zealand in exchange for sugarcane,

thus

, meeting the requirements of each other.

Moreover

,

people

can

also

reach out to each other across the border in the time of

many

Correct your spelling

any

show examples

unforeseen events

such

as natural disaster or civil wars. One

such

example includes Khalsa-aid warriors who travel to a place where

people

need help during the crises

such

as flood, war, earthquake etc. To sum up, help should not be confined to one nation and should be granted to those who need it regardless of the country due to humanitarian grounds as well as

business

Add an article

a business

show examples

point of view.