Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is more important than building houses. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that tree plantation should take place in empty spaces in urban areas more than the construction of homes. I completely agree with

this

statement. The current atmospheric condition is abominable. It is trees that can find a resolution to

this

problem whereas, building more

houses

could result in grave danger to the

environment

.

For instance

, the way trees exhale Carbon-di-oxide and human beings emit Oxygen, assists to keep our

environment

healthy and balanced. Since

people

are living in a city for a long time, they already have places for their accommodation.

Hence

, if the majority tends to feel like building more infrastructures, the fundamental components that are required for living, might get affected.

Therefore

, along with tree plantation, there should be legislation for deforestation too. Another thing that should be taken into account that

people

can live even without

houses

but can’t

last

long in a badly affected

environment

.

For example

, in

Bangladesh

Add a comma

,Bangladesh

show examples

there are thousands of

people

who do not have roofs on their head. Though they live may live along the street or footpaths, they are able to survive.

Furthermore

, there are plenty of

people

who are making their

houses

in rural areas to get rid of

this

dreadful atmosphere. Because of

this

inevitable circumstances,

people

should be more concerned about utilizing the blank spaces of both cities and towns. To conclude, though there are some issues of not having structured accommodation, they can be sorted out.

However

, if the

environment

becomes more imbalanced, the earth will become inhabitable. Henceforth, tree plantation should be prioritized rather than building

houses

.