It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a hot issue about whether all

towns

and

cities

should have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. I disagree with that opinion, in my perspective, I assume that not all

towns

and

cities

need it. A large public outdoor place contributes to citizens have fun there and offers them opportunities to involve diversity activities like amusement competitions. Having a spacious public outdoor

area

not only cost a huge amount of taxpayers money but

also

need to use a huge public space source which ought to have better usage than squares or parks.

For example

, in some developing

cities

,they can not afford the expend of building large public amusement park which is a waste of government’s fund that could be poured

in

Change preposition

into

show examples

education or the local economy so that could change local society

instead

of a park.

On the other hand

, the public

area

can not be fully used due to the less population, even if there is a large public in some tiny

cities

.It turns out

that is

a waste of money as well.

However

, things will completely different in metropolitans, because a large number of populations have more need for amusement. So, there is no need for small

towns

and tiny

cities

to have a large public

area

, especially for those developing

cities

and those that have less population. In summary, metropolitans could afford the expend of building a large public

area

instead

of tiny and underdeveloped

cities

,

besides

less population

also

will result in a waste of money due to the low-frequency usage.So,

that is

not paramount for all

towns

and

cities

to have large public outdoor places