In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and share your opinion

People

have different ideas about earning money, and the point that we will discuss is whether the salary gap between community is constructive or destructive for our society. It is paramount to discuss both sides of the stories. In upcoming paragraphs, I will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of having no limit to earning, and how, in my perspective,

this

threshold is not indispensable for the growth of a country.

First

of all, there are lots of advantages to having no limit to earning. One of the advantages is that it is an economic boost for a country if money is brought into a state.

Secondly

,

this

population can give more to charities as compared to less earning

people

, as it is a common fact that one can give more if he/she receives more.

This

can make sure that the government can help out the poor crowd in the best way possible. It

also

brings more tax that can ensure better public medical services at hospitals.

On the other hand

, there are

people

that have a different opinion on

such

matters. One of the most common white-collar crimes is tax fraud. Folks are used to hiding money from the authorities, which is a result does not help a state.

Secondly

,

this

salary gap can create a sense of insecurity amongst the

people

.

This

mantra “Rich are getting richer and poor are getting poorer” has come out as

this

difference has aged. In my perspective, if a country has a good infrastructure of tax governing bodies

then

this

could become a blessing in disguise for the entire nation