Both government and individuals are spending a large amount of money for protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

Modern governments are sensitive and concerned about the biodiversity of their respective states and expend a huge amount of
budget
to maintain the same.
However
, there is another viewpoint ,which promotes the idea of using
such
money to eradicate poverty and to improve health facilities. In my ,opinion both thoughts are independent in themselves and must be dealt with separately, while rationally using the
budget
. The
first
and foremost idea of living is about a good environment. Nature has a very balanced approach and human activities have somehow disturbed the balance, so it becomes our utmost responsibility to restore
such
equilibrium. The loss of the flora and fauna have suffered due to either industrialisation or carelessness of homo sapiens while using the god gifted resources. So the
budget
allocation by the governments to improve the habitat of animals or the environment overall is justified.
Secondly
, we can not run from the reality, which portrays that poverty is one major cause for the excessive use of natural resources and we can contain the problem by upgrading the living standards of the people. for ,instance the people ,who depend on forests for their living, must be provided with better platforms for earning to lessen the human interference in jungles.
However
, the
budget
allocated for the environment may be avoided to be used in health care as both the subject are not related and saving the species living along with us is equally important as it is to save a human life. To sum up it can be said that both concerns are independent in themselves. Even though by containing the poverty we can definitely restrict the infiltration of animal habitat but still a lot we need to do to recover the harm the human race has done in past. So the
budget
spent by governments for
such
a cause is well in justification.
Submitted by ramanghotra on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: