Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?

School

education is seen by some to focus on facts rather than practical

skills

. I agree with

this

point of view because the

school

curriculum is all about science history and theories while missing life application methods and the contemporary

market

skills

demand. To illustrate, students learn abstract information

that is

not useful in real life.

For example

, theories of atoms and elements chemical connection are taught in chemistry classes, but not the uses of chemistry in bakery, cooking, or detergents. Another example of academic information education is mathematics courses. The pupils learn how to solve equations but not how to implement

this

in life and manage their personal budget.

As a result

, students graduate with extensive theoretical knowledge

that is

outdated or irrelevant to the real world.

Moreover

, after college, graduates are required to know a set of

skills

needed for the

market

, like; how to write a CV? how to answer interview questions? and how to communicate with clients?. All the previous

skills

are not taught in

school

;

therefore

, the graduates are not prepared for the job

market

.

Hence

, they have to spend time, effort, and money on extra private courses to learn the practical

skills

needed for the

market

.

In addition

, the academic projects and assignments are not equivalent to business reporting;

thus

, pupils need to learn to write in a different way than what they used to do in

academy

Add an article

the academy

show examples

. To conclude, I agree with the statement that

school

education lacks practical

skills

and focuses more on facts.

That is

because science is taught without real-life applications,

besides

the total absence of

market

skills

necessities.