Some people believe that companies should manufacturing products that last for a long time. Others feel that the emphasis should be place on producing goods that are cheap. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is argued that organisations should focus on the manufacturing of those
products
which are inexpensive so that
it
Correct pronoun usage
they
show examples
can afford it can be availed by everyone while others believe that the quality of the
product
should be considered as
priority
Add an article
a priority
show examples
. In my opinion, a better material can be used for a longer period and has upper edges in comparison to a cheap
product
. (message is not conveyed in
last
Change the article
the last
show examples
line). Many people think that high standard and
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
long-lasting
product
have more advantages as consumer consumers spend enormous amounts from their pocket to buy a good grade
product
.
also
,
Besides
, they can gain the return
of
Change preposition
on
show examples
their investment by using it for a long time. It is
also
possible to say that
In other words
, the maintenance requirement is
also
less for reliable
products
.
For example
, many people purchase apple iPhones mobile phones because of their quality and features,
moreover
, the material used for the assembly of these cell phones are worthy and buyers can use them for many years. Alternatively,
On the other hand
, others believe that low-priced
products
are much better because anyone can buy them. There are several people living in poverty and cannot spend much on costly items.
In addition
to
this
, a big percentage of the money we are paying is used to cover the advertisements and brand name
instead
of the quality of
products
.
For instance
, the jeweller based in Sydney sell the ornaments in the different shops, but he
also
exports the same ornaments to the company having a big brand name charge double the amount when compared to other shops. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have advantages.
However
although
a low-cost
product
can allow everyone to purchase it,
but
Remove the conjunction
apply
show examples
paying for a good grade
product
saves the additional spending to maintain it and can be used for a longer time.
Submitted by daisysharma0087 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainability
  • carbon footprint
  • customer satisfaction
  • brand loyalty
  • cost-effective
  • replacement expenses
  • environmental impact
  • accessibility
  • innovation
  • variety
  • upfront costs
  • long-term investment
  • consumer behavior
  • market competition
  • affordability
  • frequent updates
  • short-term gains
  • maintenance expenses
What to do next:
Look at other essays: