Scientific research should be funded by governments rather than commercial organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is considered that commercial

organizations

are not favoured to be financial contributors to scientific

research

,

instead

,

governments

should be the ones who fund the

research

. In my perspective,

governments

cannot have the ability to raise

such

tremendous fund as private companies have been contributing

for

Change preposition

to

show examples

science.  It is indeed that the contribution of government to science is compulsory and requisite,

however

, their ability is limited.

Governments

are not

only

Change the article

the only

show examples

fund for science but

also

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

financial support for other fields,

such

as education, infrastructure, security or retirement programs.

Accordingly

,

governments

cannot contribute enough financial need for scientific projects, which requires an enormous number of investments. Since private

organizations

are the group of companies that can make a huge profit,

therefore

, they are capable of supporting science’s finances.  As the saying goes “Two is better than one”

hence

the contribution of commercial

organizations

is vital for scientific

research

. The billionaire Bill Gates,

for example

, is a major funder for WHO (World Health Organization) and CDC (Centers of Disease Control and Prevention),

thus

the two

organizations

can be able to make a tremendous number of

research

and experiment on the COVID-19 virus. The company Johnson & Johnson is

also

funding for the making of

one-dose

Correct article usage

a one-dose

show examples

COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine was predicted to be debut around one to two years, but because of the generosity of many commercial companies, our society can

finally

have the access to COVID-19 vaccines.  In conclusion, the union investment of both public and private organization is vital for scientific projects.