Some people think governments should spend money on measures to save languages with few speakers from dying out completely.Others think that this is a waste of financial resources .Discuss both views and give your opinion.

İt is a highly debated issue whether or not spending Money on

languages

that are under the die risk by the government .In

this

essay ,ı will discuss both views. On the one hand , those who say the authority should endurance to save

languages

give their reasons as follow.

Firstly

, the

language

reflects the

culture

of the

country

.Put simply,dying out completely

languages

means loss of cultures because

language

is the verbal expression of

culture

.

Secondly

,it is inescapable that the loss of

language

leads to a lack of communication among society because it is well-known fact that

language

is the best means of communication.

As a result

,

culture

and

language

are interrelated. Had the

language

been saved, the

culture

of the

country

would die out in a short time.

On the other hand

, some people ,who ı agree with those, hold the opinion that is a waste of money which is spent to save

languages

. Some speech which is unused by the most of community has had the biscuit and they become disappear , which enable people to use natural tough without different idiom,

therefore

, speakers can be understood easily regardless of the difference of speech .take some countries whose ministry do not spend money on

language

for saving an example; in

this

countriescountrycountries

country

, the

language

is more simple than others countries and society used a coherent

language

and governments should spend fund for another benefit things

such

as education or health problems,

therefore

these countries

country

could develop easily. To summarize in light of the information given above ,

although

there is a number of people who uphold the opposite ,ı believe that the state should not spend pay on having had biscuit

language

.