Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Overpopulation has led to a certain number of problems
such
as lack of food, depletion of resources and especially the increasing demand for accommodations. Plenty of urban areas have
also
devised two possible solutions to the housing problem. Some have decided to construct higher and larger buildings while others build houses on larger size lands. Personally, I believe that addressing the accommodation crisis with gigantic constructions is more viable since the other option can wreak havoc upon the environment. Taller housings can
also
be called apartments and these are capable of accommodating hundreds of households. The building plan is thought to be compact since it does not consume the majority of space. Whereas, more floors can
also
be added
further
in the construction progress.
Additionally
, the strategy allows more efficient management methods. The city government can evaluate and allocate a sufficient amount of energy usage to each home, which can tackle the arising problems with the disappearance of natural resources.
However
,
this
policy is even more useful for countries with smaller lands.
For example
, Singapore has been known for its lack of landmasses and to compensate for
this
, the authorities here chose to build more apartments for its high population, allowing public services to spread more around the country. Creating more homes in wider areas,
however
, will negatively influence the environment. As make allowances for more human accommodations, the natural habitats are destroyed and local species are probably extinct
as a result
.In fact, the world’s statistics reveal that deforestation is mostly caused by accommodation expansion
instead
of wildfires. House owners can dispose of their daily garbage anywhere as long as it is convenient for them
instead
of a general trash disposal site built around the apartment blocks.
This
will destroy the city sceneries and may lead to many infectious diseases that transmit airborne and waterborne. In Shanghai, the atmosphere is polluted not only by its industrial smoke but
also
by house owners’ one. The air inflicts damage to individuals’ lungs and emits odour to the surroundings. In conclusion, I believe that since mankind has been inflated their territory to nature, it is high time we compressed.
Therefore
, countries should allow more apartments built as it seems to be the most possible solution to our ecosystem’s current status.
Submitted by dtminhhoang2504 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban density
  • sustainability
  • public transportation
  • green spaces
  • community connections
  • overcrowding
  • economic implications
  • infrastructure impact
  • maintenance costs
  • carbon footprint
  • compact city
  • habitat destruction
  • greenhouse gas emissions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: