Some countries are handing over public services such as hospitals, railways and education to private companies to be run for commercial profit. Are governments justified in letting private profit manage the public interest?

The word " privatization " means to transfer the functional authorities to the private sector. It is

such

a major question, is the

Government

eligible to transfer public

institutes

to private companies? which run on common person tax and these independent sectors are freely allowed to maintain public interest. But in my opinion, the

government

could privatize some

institutes

with some restrictions. It's fundamental evidence, private sectors. Because there are strict rules as well as its implication.

For instance

, a 2018 survey showed that 2 times surgical operations more successful in commercial hospitals than in the

government

.

Moreover

, there is political influence in the private sector as compared to public

institutes

.

In addition

to

this

commercial hubs generate high revenue.

For example

, in Denmark car accidents rate increased by 20% but every victim had a license.

Then

government

privatize the license giving department because the

government

got the reports of corruption,

then

within two ,years results were changed.

On the other hand

for general public privatisation is more sound like the rising up cost. As a piece of evidence in 2017 Nepal's providence gave the authority of the electricity department to a private firm. As a ,

result

Add the preposition

inresult

fromresult

show examples

the public had to face high bill's. To conclude

government

should privatize the white elephant sector of the country. So may these

institutes

could generate decent mark up too, but basic facilities like hospital, education, and security should be provided by the

government

. So everything should go in the interest of the country.