Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic? What are the benefits and disadvantages of this?

Nowadays more and more

tourists

are exploring

places

where are pretty hostile. Travelling in

such

extreme

conditions

has positive aspects including a sense of exhilaration

besides

turning an inhabitable place into a residence,

however

, there is a negative side for

tourists

as well. Having a marvellous experience for those who make a journey to a pretty hostile region would be fascinating. Needless to say,

such

adventures would confront unprecedented

places

hardly seen before. Having to say, the sightseer can

also

release endorphin, escape from the stress coming from hustling and bustling. So, where could be better than a remote tranquil area covering snow with rays of sunshine? Certainly,

tourists

have a sense of fulfilment and excitement in visiting continental polar.

Besides

this

, travelling on the remote mountains leads to exploring treasures from ancestors, an unknown carved cave,

for example

. And the bulk of

such

journeys might be looking out the inhabitable region and

then

turning it into a tourist’s attraction path where a new society can be

also

flourished. On the other side, there is suffering from natural

conditions

that seem to be a disadvantage.

Tourists

probably deal with the scarcity of water in Sahara deserts or freezing cold in the Antarctic where their physical health is at risk.

Besides

this

, wildlife in extreme

conditions

makes these regions frightful and dangerous.

For example

, confronting toxic snakes and polar bears habituating there can attack and injure

tourists

. In conclusion, exploring

places

where are pretty hostile could be an exciting experience along with giving an opportunity to find and build a life in inhabitable

places

,

however

, threats that come from wildlife and extreme

conditions

is a drawback and cannot be relinquished.