Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Conducting experiments on
animals
is commonplace.
Although
there are some real benefits to the human society favouring
this
practice, the sufferings of
animals
are much more significant. In my opinion,
therefore
, it is imperative that all forms of animal testing should be completely prohibited by the law. On the one hand, it is true to say that performing tests on
animals
is advantageous for both consumers and manufacturers. For pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies, prior testing on
animals
is not only affordable but
also
can help spot and rule out any hazardous components in a newly-developed product,
such
as a type of lipstick or medicine, before it is introduced to the market.
Therefore
, the stage is considered necessary for both the firm and future consumers, because at the same time the production cost is minimized, merchandise safety for human consumption can
also
be ensured.
As a result
, tests on
animals
is still ubiquitous among industrial and medical laboratories.
On the other hand
, governments are recommended to forbid conducting animal experimentations.
This
is because ,in the modern days,
animals
are regarded to be the same as a human with emotions and feelings,
thus
should equally be protected by rights and laws. As far as it is concerned, doing harm to them is morally unacceptable no matter how helpful it might be for a human.
Moreover
, technological advancement today provides people with several alternative testing methods,
such
as artificial biological molecules, so imposing impediments against using
animals
for experimental purposes is a way to encourage the shift towards less inhumane practices. In summary,
although
testing on
animals
is still common for its safety and affordability, my opinion is that it should be replaced with other modern biological technologies
such
as engineered cells.
This
is because the sufferings of these living creatures are much more considerable than the possible merits.
Submitted by doannguyenhadan on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: