Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
#british #australian #laws #jury #case #access #information #defendant #record #person #crime #lawyers #practice #facts #decision
Jurisdiction is an important aspect to deal with
criminals
in our society. Different countries have their own set of rules and regulation. In Britain and Australia there is no provision to see past criminal records
of any criminals
, and thus
provides an opportunity for them to escape from getting accused. I completely agree with the suggestions that this
mall practice should be amended.
It is not a good idea to no access the past criminal records
. This
creates problems in prooving crime
and there will be no justice in society. Another problem is that the crime
rate will increase in the area as less fear of punishment and they are not behind bars. For example
, Australia has a high rate of racism against foreign nationals. If there were provision to look at criminals
previous records
, these crimes would have fallen drastically.
In another word, if barristers can see the past records
of any prosecutors, it can help in allocating proper punishment to the accused. For instance
, the USA courts allow to find previous criminal records
of criminals
, hence
verdict is delivered appropriately and in a timely manner. Consequently
, the crime
rate has fallen sharply in the last
few decades. Criminals
have no chance of escaping as all their data are saved in police custody.
In conclusion, in order to get optimum punishment to those who commit a crime
, past records
are required. This
system provides all the available information which help lawyers to pronounce suitable fine and confinements. I totally agree with this
statement that this
practise
should be changed as suggested by some proponents to deliver justice to each and every individual of society.Replace the word
practice
Submitted by suniliftm1982 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.