Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some people consider that it is more optimal

government

to share its budget on lines rather than public tracks. The notion of being focused on increasing the usage of trains is one that I support mostly. These days, the growth of public transport and cars emit toxins into the weather and cause detrimental effects on our environment.Taking into account

this

reason it is preferable to redesign infrastructure and convert it into lines.

This

means of transport gives us chance to reach our destinations faster and cheaper.

For example

, while we wait for buses,we experience a waste of time ,as well as suffer from external influences as climate conditions.

Consequently

, it impacts people to get nervous and exhausted.If the

government

decline the trend of roads and increase the number of railways,people will satisfy.

Moreover

,the environment is harmed by fossil fuels which are released from automobiles. Providing that to construct plenty of railways they will prevent nature from damage.

Besides

, establishing roads is challenging and needs to waste a huge amount of money. Due to the fact that

this

type of transport means demand less budget and reasonable from all aspects,

this

proposal is acceptable.

For instance

, a line connects more cities than roads.

Instead

of constructing many ways and spend on them a high amount of money, they can do one railway which can play a role as a bridge between two or more cities.As the

government

take

this

issue as a paramount one, they will witness how it is profitable and satisfy society. To conclude,

although

to have roadways in a country is inevitable,I firmly argue that expanding the number of railways will save the

government

`s budget , protect our nature from detrimental effects, as well humans from stress.