You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.

In recent years,

architectural

Add an article

the architectural

an architectural

show examples

framework has never failed to attract people’s attention and spark controversy over the responsibility of

this

construction

on the country. Some firmly hold a view that scheme and building are concerned by the authority in a metropolis;

however

, to the best of my knowledge, I personally believe that the state should not take control over the picture of houses and other facilities. On the one hand, the authority is responsible for creating shelter for its

resident

.

In other words

, the government has to protect the country's welfare,

such

as education, health care, especially framework.

First

, the state constructs the architecture of roads, bridges, and other accommodations, which benefits the

resident

and properly uses residents' taxes.

Second

, the drawing of enormous

construction

requires lots of sponsorship and money from the authorities.Those outweigh individual capacities in finance.

As a result

, with the ministry’s responsibility, the crowded city will have

various

Add an article

a various

the various

show examples

astonishing house and a peaceful place to live.

On the other hand

, individuals have the privilege to design their own houses or private

construction

because that represents the freedom for everyone to practice democracy.

For instance

, we could have planned the blueprint of the house

then

acted to construct and decorate that block with our tastes.

Furthermore

, entrepreneurs possibly invest their money to build up large and influential architecture without law involvement.

However

, the

construction

have

Change the verb form

has

show examples

to be limited

in-laws

Change preposition

to in-laws

show examples

and not for military and terrorist purposes.

Therefore

,

resident

Add an article

a resident

the resident

show examples

could attach their distinct house to the country to increase the diversity infrastructure and the individual's liberty. As in the aforementioned explanations, though

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

politics

has

Change the verb form

have

show examples

a great impact on building framework for their

resident

, the model of

resident

' houses or freedom to construct can’t be plundered by the authority in the big cities.