Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children. To what extent do you agree?

In

this

contemporary era, following the superstars by the younger generation as their

role

model

is a burning topic of discussion.

However

, Many folks opine that

media

coverage of celebrities adversely impacts children. I disagree with the aforementioned notion, and I will discuss the same in upcoming paragraphs with examples. On the one hand, those who believe that presenting the legends by

media

is harmful to teenagers argue that adolescents do not have enough maturity to think about their good or bad.

In addition

, if they follow a bad character as their

role

model

, they would behave negatively.

For instance

, a survey recently conducted by The British Government has revealed that the 80% of the younger generation follow famous persons as their ideal.

Therefore

, As print and digital

media

always try to cover the personal lives of superstars that affects children as well.

On the other hand

, those who think that

this

is a positive trend and beneficial for children always argue that imitating their

role

models in a real-life brings a plethora of positives.

Additionally

, teenagers start dreaming big when they follow the legends as their

role

model

that often results in a

success

story.

For example

, Virat Kohli imitated Sachin Tendulkar as his

role

model

, which eventually made him one of the most successful cricketers in the world.

Therefore

, by imitating their

role

models, teenagers are achieving

success

in their career. In conclusion, we have discussed both the pros and cons of

media

coverage of legends on adolescents. In my opinion, If the younger generation follows the

success

story and lifestyle of their

role

model

, they would achieve

success

in their careers.