Some feel governments should invest in preserving minority languages, while others feel this is not a good use of resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is indeed a fact that native languages are disappearing day by day. A certain segment of society asserted that bureaucrats ought to be spent to save mother tongue. Whereas, rest of the individuals believes it is unworthy to invest in
such
things.
This
essay tends to discuss both the ideology followed by my opinion.
To begin
with, the major reason why a section of society holds the belief that government should invest in saving minority language is that it connects with the culture. To elucidate, native tongue aids us to be in touch with a tradition of the nation.
Consequently
, uplifts the name and fame of the country. To exemplify, as per a survey conducted by the Indian Cultural Central Bureau in 2018, the Mumbai government started champian to boost their mother voice by which most of Mumbai citizens able to speak Maharashtra promptly.
As a result
, they have made their own identity not merely in India but at the world level. Thereby, it is imperative to preserve a basic tone of the town.
On the other hand
, it is not fruitful to use cash on
such
a factor as there are few speakers of the same language. To explicate, the different state has their own language
therefore
, it will be
cost effective
Add a hyphen
cost-effective
show examples
to save individuals' jargon.
Hence
, the economy of the nation will be highly affected.
For instance
, as per recent research done by The Times of India, India has numerous states and each place have their own style of speech, which is not possible for the authority to save them all. Concurrently, it would be better if the regime should invest in other sectors
such
as
medical
Replace the word
medicine
show examples
and education for the development of a person and society as a whole. To conclude, while it is true that saving local languages is crucial for conserving cultures associated with them, in my opinion, it is more important for the government to invest in essential services like healthcare and education.
Hence
, I am in favour of those who racked that spending a lot of money on saving languages is not a better option.
Submitted by artigourav1992 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: