Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Tertiary education has varied types of subjects to offer to both genders.

Hence

Linking Words

, providing equivalent attendees in terms of male and female in every subject is not a wise decision.

This

Linking Words

is simply because of the variation in the interests in the subject field and criteria.

First

Linking Words

and foremost, both the sex have different choices.

This

Linking Words

is to say that their goals are completely opposite. Women's,

for example

Linking Words

, would like to pursue their higher education in specialising in Accountancy or finance whereas most of the men's would like to have a master's degree in engineering. If the admissions are divided into half of male and the other half to female pupils

then

Linking Words

it does not make any sense. So, for

this

Linking Words

, the reason I would say that maintaining equality in terms of subjects is not advisable. Another disagreement is that setting up

such

Linking Words

criteria would lose out some high scorer learner. Getting admission to a university with

such

Linking Words

a policy,

for instance

Linking Words

, have the chances of not selecting students that are willing to join. To elaborate, if a male pupil applies to a college for higher studies but the college has already met its 50 per cent criteria of opting for a male student and there are still seats available in the category of females; it would not allow that learner to get admission because of the rule.

Therefore

Linking Words

, it is well-advised if tertiary institutions do not have

such

Linking Words

regulations. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

looking forward as per the law, equality must be maintained. It is,

however

Linking Words

, not necessary in

such

Linking Words

matters as the same quantity of men and women in every subject for the reasons stated.