Tertiary education has varied types of subjects to offer to both genders.
Hence
, providing equivalent attendees in terms of male and female in every subject is not a wise decision. Linking Words
This
is simply because of the variation in the interests in the subject field and criteria.
Linking Words
First
and foremost, both the sex have different choices. Linking Words
This
is to say that their goals are completely opposite. Women's, Linking Words
for example
, would like to pursue their higher education in specialising in Accountancy or finance whereas most of the men's would like to have a master's degree in engineering. If the admissions are divided into half of male and the other half to female pupils Linking Words
then
it does not make any sense. So, for Linking Words
this
, the reason I would say that maintaining equality in terms of subjects is not advisable.
Another disagreement is that setting up Linking Words
such
criteria would lose out some high scorer learner. Getting admission to a university with Linking Words
such
a policy, Linking Words
for instance
, have the chances of not selecting students that are willing to join. To elaborate, if a male pupil applies to a college for higher studies but the college has already met its 50 per cent criteria of opting for a male student and there are still seats available in the category of females; it would not allow that learner to get admission because of the rule. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is well-advised if tertiary institutions do not have Linking Words
such
regulations.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
looking forward as per the law, equality must be maintained. It is, Linking Words
however
, not necessary in Linking Words
such
matters as the same quantity of men and women in every subject for the reasons stated.Linking Words
poojapitalia