Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing the medicines intended for human beings, others however think it is cruel and unnecessary.Discuss both views and give your opinion?

As we all know, the pharmaceutical industry is developing very rapidly nowadays. Every day, we can see new medicines and vaccines are getting available in the market for our better health. These discoveries take a lot of time and effort of

people

working on them and are being experimented on the

animals

before getting approval to be used by the humans. In the opinion of many

people

,

this

approach of scientists is very brutal and barbaric. In my opinion, it is always better to

check

them on the

animals

first

to make these drugs safer for

use

.

First

of all, it is always dangerous to

check

these products directly on humans as they can be life-threatening.

Moreover

, there might be ingredients that can prove to be an allergen for few

people

. One should be sure about the safety index of the drugs before they are being administered to a person.

Secondly

,

people

opposing

this

argument say that it is heinous crime to

use

animals

in your experiment as many of them lost their lives too during

such

researches.

Therefore

, it is better to

check

them on the humans directly and these innocents creatures should not be punished by

such

acts of experimentation. In a nutshell, to

check

the efficacy and safety of new medicines, they should be

first

utilised on other species so we can see fewer medicine-related incidents in our hospitals and have better pharmaceutical products in our world. It is important not to

use

blindly on

animals

,in fact, the

use

should be justified and should be terminated

on

Change preposition

apply

show examples

first

-hand if it is looking hazardous for them.