Some people argue that historic buildings should be preserved in their original form. Others argue that this is both inadvisable and impossible. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the past few decades, there has been a profound increase in saving the ancient establishments in many countries. On one side of the spectrum, there are those that believe the historic buildings should be maintained in their original form.
However
, others, including myself, believe that it is highly impracticable to restore the ancient
structures
and that
money
should be spent elsewhere.
To begin
, there is an argument to be made that it is highly impossible to preserve ancient architecture in its original form due to the unavailability of resources and cost. To illustrate, the authentic raw material used centuries ago is extremely difficult to find, many contractors use alternative forms of material which is more readily available. What is more, when the original resources are discovered, it is extremely costly to buy.
Furthermore
, the funding
that is
used to restore the old
structures
is taken from the taxpayers which many citizens oppose and believe, that
money
can be used for better causes. Taking
this
into consideration, it is not unreasonable to assume that
this
is the reason many councils do not invest in preserving the ancient places due to the high cost.
Nonetheless
, despite the obstacles of saving historic establishments, there is growing evidence that suggests if a country invests in protecting old
structures
, it will benefit the economy and save the culture. To exemplify, poor countries often splurge in preserving the historic places as
this
attracts tourists, which has a direct impact on the country's economical growth, as tourists spend
money
on local businesses.
Furthermore
, saving the original architecture educates future generations and holiday-makers about the historical heritage.
Hence
, if these points are taken into consideration,
then
many governments will have a greater interest in preserving the ancient
structures
whilst contributing to education and the economy. To conclude from the aforementioned discussion,while some are under the impression
that is
justifiable to spend millions in preserving the old buildings, others, including myself, strongly believe the council should look into spending that
money
on other causes affecting the people.
Submitted by mehulsharma on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: