Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

These days, because of the improvement of technology, individuals became able to take many kinds of transportations.

Therefore

Linking Words

, what types of vehicle do they want to take is depends on the individuals. When it comes to the argument that whether the government should concentrate on improving railways or roads, I tend to agree with the former. In the following essay, I would argue both sides.

First

Linking Words

of all, railways are able to transport a plethora of passengers and commodities. As a consequence, there are merits that the risk of traffic jam will decrease, and the price of the goods will be cheaper.

For example

Linking Words

, in Tokyo, Japan, the metro is well developed and many people use it rather than cars;

therefore

Linking Words

, the traffic jam hardly occurs in the city.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, as trains can convey numerous commodities at a time, it enables producers to cut the cost of transportation. To sum up, there are merits of improving railways.

Second

Linking Words

of all,

on the other hand

Linking Words

, there might be an area

that is

Linking Words

not suitable for constructing the lines.

For instance

Linking Words

, because the government did not know that the ground in a particular area in Osaka was too soft and not suitable for making the rail lines, the road has been subsided. As it is in the area that there are many houses, the residents get into trouble.

Thus

Linking Words

, the government should check its safety before investing in construction. In my conclusion, I believe that investing in rail lines is beneficial;

thus

Linking Words

, I tend to agree with the premise.

However

Linking Words

, its suitability should be considered beforehand.