Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their chuldren’s Study. On the contrary , those online games have produced a lot of negative effect on their mental and physical development. What is your opinion

It is often believed that playing

computer

games

is useless for the study of

children

while

some people are optimistic about their effects on their bodies and minds. I partially support the latter, for the emergence of new types of

games

which promote logical thinking and physical strength regardless of the incredible distraction that prevents their study. On the one hand,

computer

games

are advantageous for

children

as they encourage the development of physical strength and logical minds.

For example

, they are able to enjoy sports on a

computer

screen with a sensor attached to their wrists and legs, which requires them to have some exercise to defeat online players.

Furthermore

,

children

are more likely to associate one idea with another to solve various missions, enhancing their abilities to memorize and think critically.

Thus

, problem-solving skills are often higher for those who spend more time playing

computer

games

with more experience in using their brains.

On the other hand

,

computer

games

have a damaging effect on studying performance of

children

as they tend to be addictive to them. Indeed, it is often difficult for them to quit

games

as they are expected to make progress by defeating enemies or discovering a hidden way to move to another stage.

Furthermore

, there are many incentives provided by

games

so they can continue through rewards and new items, which make players more excited.

Consequently

,

this

leads to poor results in their study as they are less motivated and spend less time on learning. In conclusion, I somewhat agree that

computer

games

are beneficial to

children

, who are often required to use their bodies and minds to compete against enemies.

However

, the addictive nature of

games

encourages

children

to spend more time on them, leading to an unsatisfactory outcome in their studies.