Many governments spend a lot of money on art. Some people think this investment in art is necessary, but others say the money is better spent on improving health and education. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In the contemporary era, it generally accepted that
art
enriches
society
and plays a valuable role in culture and
history
.
Although
to promote the arts organization,
art
galleries, and other
art
-related matters government invest a big amount of
money
on it, others believe that hard cash should be invested in public service and a good cause. In my, opinion spending
money
on accelerating medical and educational needs is more important than
art
. There are two main reasons why people think spending
money
on artwork is essential.
First
and foremost, it represents the culture and
history
of the
society
. As an artist are the one who keeps alive the
history
of the
society
in their artwork, it’s essential to spend
money
on it so that they not only keep motivated but
also
encourage new artist.
In addition
to
this
, in the techno ,world everything would be possible with help of technology including
art
, so to keep gathering attention on real
art
it's important to spend some handsome amount on it.
For instance
, Madhubani is a special kind of
art
of Bihar, it represents the culture and
history
of Bihar. So, to promote the indigenous
art
of
society
and artist they required government
support
. There are ,
however
, some people including me, who think that taxpayers’ hard cash should be invested in public services. As most
art
galleries are getting a huge amount of
money
from their ticket price, it’s important to invest in accelerating medical
support
by the proliferation of staff and technologies.
For instance
, there are more than 5000 tourist visits Delhi
art
museum daily by paying $20 ticket price, so the museum itself earn $10000 daily and it looks like it’s more than sufficient to run a museum. Clearly, the government needs to financially
support
other public areas which actually required financial
support
in order to improve. In conclusion, as
art
galleries have other options to generate
money
its good to invest it in the area which are accessible by a large number of people and which actually required financial
support
.
Submitted by manasvimahant on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: