Some people believe that women should be able to join their country’s army and police forces, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion, including examples from your knowledge and experience.

A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to have feminine participation in army and police national team or not. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of view and

then

give my own perspective on the matter. There are people who argue that the benefits of not have only

men

in a country’s security considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing

this

is that

women

, in general, are so resistant than

men

and they could help them much more than some man who is not motivated for some reason. It is

also

possible to say that we must fight for gender equality in society and believe that everyone is fighting together to protect their nation. One good illustration of

this

is in sports where many

women

are performing well than

men

in activities that are used well-known by

men

’s ability, like soccer.

On the other hand

, others believe that national police and army forces should not allow

women

to participate. It is often argued that they could not be able to improve security. People often have

this

opinion because in many situations

women

do not have the same strength that the opposite sex has due to biological's factors. A

second

point is that many

men

could show a lack of confidence in their feminine partners at

first

and

this

could create a bad relationship between both sex and segregate them.

For example

,

although

the main mission of a police officer should be to protect your colleague, they usually struggle to protect those who treat them well and show confidence in their job. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, I feel that

women

are able to join national’s security.

This

is because they are so smart and brave like

men

and only judge them by sex gender are not the best argument to be against their participation in our protection.