many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is a common belief that

interview

is the fundamental way to judge any

person

for a

job

.

However

, a majority of

people

oppose that notion, they believe that there are other methods better than an

interview

for purifying the perfect

person

for a place in the

job

. I completely disagree with

this

statement. In

this

essay, I shall elaborate reasons for that.

To begin

with, it is irrefutable that there are numerous

people

who do not have achievements or any work experience but they are good at particular skills. An

interview

provides an opportunity for them to show their skills and by that, an interviewer decides that he or she is suitable for the position or not.

For instance

, a well-known company Google take interviews and only provide

job

by skills and if the

person

is even uneducated they still give a chance to represent their knowledge.

Furthermore

, to just get a

job

,

people

lie in their CV or resume and many

people

get the

job

by it, because of that

person

people

who is more perfect for the position, have to face much more competition as well as its increase complexity for selecting a

person

. The

interview

makes it so easy by taking exams, asking for quotations, giving problems to solve, etc, not only for the

job

but

also

in any kind of selections.

For example

, in one of the best university in Canada Dalhousie, which takes the

interview

in the selection of students, the student must have to qualify

interview

to get admission to the university. Encapsulating the above data is time-consuming but still an efficient way to judge anyone for a position and

therefore

I can say that it is the best way for any type of selection.