The adverse effect of sugar on health is well known to the public now. Some believe that the government should control the amount of sugar people consume. Others think that it is the responsibility of an individual to monitor their sugar intake. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to have

rate

Add an article

a rate

the rate

show examples

of

sugar

consumed by individuals moderated by authorities or not. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of view and

then

give my own perspective about the matter. There are

people

who argue that the benefits of

sugar

regulation by

government

Correct article usage

the government

show examples

considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main

reasons

Fix the agreement mistake

reason

show examples

for believing

this

is that it can help

people

improve their diet and it means

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

issues related to their health

such

obesity

Change preposition

as obesity

show examples

. It is

also

possible to say that helping

people

to choose

for

Change preposition

apply

show examples

healthier alimentation

instead

of food with a lot of

carbohydrate

Change to a plural noun

carbohydrates

show examples

means less money spent

in

Change preposition

on

show examples

health’s problems. One good illustration of

this

is soda,

although

coke is for almost everyone more tasteful than water, it has huge side effects

for

Change preposition

on

show examples

human’s

Correct article usage

the human’s

show examples

body.

On the other hand

, others believe that each person is able to control the total

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

sugar

consumed. It is often argued that everyone knows what amount fits in their

basis

Replace the word

basic

show examples

diet.

People

often have

this

opinion because each one should be in control of their body and always looking at improving their alimentation plan what it includes

sugar

ratio. A

second

point is that it is easier to change your food options based on yourself than

in

Change preposition

on

show examples

other individuals. A particularly good example here is that everyone would be able to choose food that they like, but with less

sugar

in their composition. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance,

however

, I feel that government should restringe the amount of

sugar

in foods and drinks.

This

is because it would affect those who are trying to keep

in

Change preposition

apply

show examples

fit and those who are not healthiest and can not start by themselves.