Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Wild creatures are lesser in weightage of ecosystem chain than humankind. In

this

regard only, some individuals believe that utilization of excess assets on these creatures will be a wastage of our resources and time

in contrast

to

this

we can deploy more power at medical

research

and erecting the

infrastructure

which will be beneficial for humans

nonetheless

, I agree with

this

idealogy to a greater extent and it's affiliated justification will be elucidated in the forthcoming paragraph. At the outset, the conspicuous reason to resources and weightage should be on decreasing mode in the protection of wild beasts is that the public funds are limited,

hence

cannot be used on unwanted topics ,

such

as given protection to endangered species as these creatures will not have an impact on the ecosystem,

For instance

,

For instance

, of

thousands

Add the preposition

ofthousands

show examples

years ago dinosaurs were demolished completely on the earth ,through

research

done by scientists , elimination of these beast does not have an impact on the food chain as other animals (lion,bear rhinasourse) took their space .

Furthermore

, after their demolishing,the threat to humankind is

also

decreased due to all these reasons we should carefully use our funds. To boot,another cogent reason standing that money should be invested in medical

research

such

as medicine for HIV ,cancer and coronaviruses will not only save the human life but

also

generate revenues for a country To elaborate the vaccination which is developed by the scientists of our nation having demand on a worldwide level which will improve the status of foreign currency.

secondly

government should work on improving the

infrastructure

such

as roads , building, hospital ,school and airport which will be beneficial for the citizens.for ,example if we have good

infrastructure

then

we will take less time using and can work more efficiently . So government should work on a balanced approach. To conclude, inconsideration to above analysis it is transparent that owing to utilize our funds and energy on

research

and

infrastructure

development will be more beneficial to the nations citizens rather than spending on species will not have an impact on the food chain

however

government can use the hardcover fund in a systematic way which can be helpful for all kind of living organisms.