Being an organiser of international sports events like the Olympics is considered as a matter of prestige for a nation whereas another opinion is that it is not good. Both of the contrasting viewpoints will be discussed in
essay along with my opinion and conclusion.
with, hosting an international game challengest opens the door for many novel opportunities.
, it gives a boost to the tourism sector as many players,media,spectators etc. travel across the border to witness the moment.
, building an infrastructure to host at a bigger scale leads to massive construction work which gives employment to the poor as well as skilled workforce, which in turn leads to the boom in the economy.
, the up-gradation of the sports facilities and public transportation is a consequential outcome. Not only the status of the host is enhanced in the global arena but it
gives exposure to the local budding players by making them witness the competition of the highest scale.
, a section of individuals thinks that hosting an international competition is not good as a huge sum of money is spent on the preparation as well as the main ceremony which could
be spent on making the citizens especially lower economic strata to help them meet both ends. They feel that the government must prioritise the things and focus on providing the basic amenities rather than spending it on the unnecessary things requiring a handsome expenditure.
, a man dying from hunger has nothing to do with the pastime.
, the influx of so many foreigners can lead to an increase in the incidences of crime. Sometimes, it is seen that traffic is diverted due to the schedule. The holidays are declared to avoid congestion on roads. All these things add to the hardships of a common man.
In my opinion, global events should be hosted by those countries which have been able to provide their citizens with the basic needs of life. Alternatively, poor and developing ones should focus on training the athletes by providing them with enough facilities like cash assistance, a good diet and the best coaches.
, They should try to eliminate poverty before thinking about organising international competitions involving the outlay of a hefty amount.
, it would be an injustice to the millions of needy and hungry people watching grandiose celebrations and lights from far with an empty stomach.
To conclude, I would say that the hosting of international events directly depends on the fiscal position of a country. If it has sufficient money, it is good to host a competition and
, if it is poor, it has a long way to go before thinking about spending a lion's share on them.
balanced approach looks completely justified in my point of view.