Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Many historical

buildings

are protected by law as part of a nation’s heritage. Some people argue that these structures should be demolished and replaced with new ones. I disagree with

this

viewpoint, and in

this

essay, I will explain several reasons why preserving historical landmarks is crucial.

Firstly

, old

buildings

often have significant stories behind them,

such

as those related to wars, religious events, or the personal histories of their builders. These structures serve as tangible connections to our past and should be maintained and repaired by the government.

For example

, Old Batavia in Jakarta is a historical site that has been converted into a museum. It attracts many visitors who learn about Indonesia’s history during the World War era,

thus

passing on important cultural narratives to future generations.

Secondly

, preserving historical

buildings

can boost a country’s tourism industry and increase national revenue.

For instance

, Borobudur Temple, a renowned landmark in Indonesia, draws thousands of visitors each year, particularly during Vesak Day, when Buddhists from around the world gather to celebrate.

Although

an earthquake once damaged parts of the temple, the government promptly repaired it, demonstrating the importance of maintaining

such

sites for cultural and economic reasons. In conclusion, there are various compelling reasons to maintain and protect old

buildings

, including their historical significance and their potential to generate tourism revenue. Educating the younger generation about these heritage sites can encourage them to value and promote their preservation globally.