Many scientific institutes conduct research on live animals. Some people regard it as cruel and unnecessary while others believe it is justified in the interest of human welfare. Discuss the two views and give your reasons. Give reason for your answer.

Technology plays an integral part in improving the lives of people. With the advent of
this
, there are some split opinions regarding the testing on living
animals
. A set of persons believe it to be immoral, while a group of thinkers support
this
experimentation process and considers it to be imperative for human benefits.
However
, as in my opinion, its disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In
this
essay, I will justify my decision, after analysing both sides of the argument. Examining the former view, the primary argument supporters put forward is it is extremely inhumane to do live testing on
animals
. The reason being
such
deeds are done for human cosmetics, which is completely non-agreeable.
For example
, the testing is done on the fishes and various species for adding fragrances to the perfumes.
Furthermore
, the skins of lions, tigers and various carnivores are used by high-end brands for clothing.
In addition
, genetic modification is conducted to increase the production of domestic
animals
. Indeed, all
this
is considered unethical and immoral in some religious scripts.
On the contrary
, few others claim
this
notion to be imperative for the advancement of humans.
For instance
, snake poison, which is extracted is used in various drugs and medicines, which cures perilous diseases like cancer and specific heart ailments. Indeed,the tests on cows, buffaloes give a boost in milk-producing capacities, though it is highly painful for them. To recapitulate,
although
the claim of the tests on alive
animals
is beneficial for humans has gravity, but the purpose for which it is hugely done is unacceptable and unjust.
Nevertheless
, the significance of the species in maintaining the food chain is extremely necessary. As per my belief,
such
a human tendency to show supremacy over species should end.
Submitted by kunalshah74 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: