The government money should be invested in teaching science rather than other subject so as to help the country make progress and develop. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is thought by Some that government funding should lay emphasis on teaching

science

instead

of other subject for

country

growth and development.

Although

science

is important aspect for nation progress but other

subjects

such

as physical education ,mathematics ,literature are equally important.

This

essay disagree with the statement, the elaboration of which are given in the following paragraph.

To begin

with, other

subjects

are equally important as

science

alone could not lead to advancement of nation; another

subjects

:art ,craft literature. If student do not know the history of

country

where is living how they will represent our

country

when competition is done globally.

For instance

,knowledge about the various monuments: Taj Mahal red Fort could be beneficial for students to explain others about how

such

historical monuments are assets of the

country

.

Thus

,gaining knowledge of every sphere is compulsory as well as necessity. Apart from that, investment in the one area is another reason of disagreement .Equal proportionate of funds would led to minimise risk and could be helpful to concentrate on other areas. Money should be divided in

such

a way that the other sectors would develop simultaneously

such

as sports infrastructure.

Thus

, minimising risk could lead to improve economy of

country

. In conclusion,

subjects

alike literature, art, history would not be taken for granted as comparative to

science

, as all holds equal weightage for overall advancement of nation .

Thus

, balanced approach could prove fruitful both for

country

as well as inhabitants .