Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Travelling to
work
is what
people
do on a daily basis. Some individuals believe that residential
areas
should be built in the city centre to replace green
areas
.
However
,
although
this
replacement can reduce the commute
time
, I would argue that it is not beneficial to commuters as those green
areas
are good places for workers to relax. On one hand,
people
support replace parks and gardens with apartment buildings in the city centre because it can help
people
cut down the
time
for travelling to
work
. A number of
people
are suffering from long-distance commutes every day. They have to get up early to catch a train or a bus.
As a result
, they may feel exhausted when they get to
work
after a long-
time
travelling.
Therefore
, if the apartment building is close to their workplace, they will not need to get up early and have more
time
to make themselves ready for
work
.
On the other hand
, I would argue
this
replacement is not beneficial to workers because there will be no places for them to relax if parks and gardens are replaced.
For example
, individuals who are stressed would like to go for a walk and get some fresh air during lunch break. They may not be able to find a good place to go since there is no parks or gardens nearby. If they are not able to relax during lunch break, they are likely to have no energy for the afternoon and their productivity will be low. In
this
case, their
work
performances can be affected. In conclusion,
although
concentrating
residential
Change preposition
on residential
show examples
areas
in the city centre can help reduce commute
time
, I would argue that
this
action is not beneficial to workers because they would not be able to find a good place to relax during break
time
.
Submitted by lucky19961104 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • commuters
  • urban areas
  • housing availability
  • alleviating housing crises
  • public transport
  • traffic congestion
  • environmental health
  • biodiversity
  • recreational
  • mental health benefits
  • urban heat islands
  • green lungs
  • community interaction
  • cohesion
  • innovative urban planning
  • multi-use buildings
What to do next:
Look at other essays: