Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

In British and Australia, a

judge

Use synonyms

can'

t

Use synonyms

get permission to know the previous criminal

history

Use synonyms

of the accused person which resulted in the protection of the defendant.

Consequently

Linking Words

, it is suggested by some lawyers that

this

Linking Words

culture ought to be changed and a

judge

Use synonyms

should be provided all the previous records before achieving their final comment about the case. In my opinion, I

also

Linking Words

agreed with the suggestion given by some judges. On one hand, the court doesn'

t

Use synonyms

give access to past information of defendants to the

Judge

Use synonyms

to make a final

decision

Use synonyms

. Sometimes past events may affect the

judge

Use synonyms

's negative views and thinking ability on the people who accused of the case but actually he/she not.

For instance

Linking Words

, suppose a person who was involved with a

crime

Use synonyms

before coincidently but

this

Linking Words

person doesn'

t

Use synonyms

commit any

crime

Use synonyms

at

this

Linking Words

time. In

this

Linking Words

scenario, if a

judge

Use synonyms

takes the

decision

Use synonyms

based on the previous

history

Use synonyms

, it might be inaccurate and punish an innocent one.

However

Linking Words

, know the other crimes would help the

judge

Use synonyms

sometimes to give a more precise

decision

Use synonyms

and prevent misunderstandings.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, it is perceived by some judges that they must need to know the past facts to make a final

decision

Use synonyms

about the accused people.

Although

Linking Words

the

decision

Use synonyms

should be based on the present

crime

Use synonyms

and present laws rules, sometimes it is really difficult to know the nature of accused people without knowing his/her past

crime

Use synonyms

.

For example

Linking Words

, suppose a robbery has been done by a group of the gang in a country but the police couldn'

t

Use synonyms

catch them at the spot. In

this

Linking Words

case, the

judge

Use synonyms

must need to know the previous

history

Use synonyms

of these types of crimes to make a final

decision

Use synonyms

. In conclusion, there are different ideas in court and laws where a

judge

Use synonyms

can play a role based on the situation.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, knowing the past

history

Use synonyms

is the most important part to make a final

decision

Use synonyms

about a

crime

Use synonyms

.